<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Financial Hippie &#187; Solar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://financialhippie.com/tag/solar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://financialhippie.com</link>
	<description>the long and the short of it...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:34:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Balance sheet wars &#8211; US solar companies vs. the Chinese government. Who&#8217;s going to win that one?</title>
		<link>http://financialhippie.com/2009/08/balance-sheet-wars-us-solar-companies-vs-the-chinese-government/</link>
		<comments>http://financialhippie.com/2009/08/balance-sheet-wars-us-solar-companies-vs-the-chinese-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Financial Hippie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialhippie.com/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know the foot race that is going on in the solar industry - companies are trying to achieve the lowest per megawatt cost for an installed system. Until the next leapfrogging technology comes along, the most important factor to drive down cost is scale*. Here is where the US solar companies will have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://financialhippie.com/2009/08/balance-sheet-wars-us-solar-companies-vs-the-chinese-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
